Jackson v. Davis

Filing 9

ORDER ACCEPTING 7 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The successive petition for writ of habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 4/24/2017) (sss)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ANDREW LEE JACKSON, #621203, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Director TDCJ-CID, Respondent. § § § § § § § 3:17-CV-0933-B-BK ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. Petitioner filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the successive petition for writ of habeas corpus is TRANSFERRED to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1631.1 SO ORDERED this 24th day of April, 2017. _________________________________ JANE J. BOYLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 An order transferring a successive application to the court of appeals is not a final order requiring a certificate of appealability. See United States v. Fulton, 780 F.3d 683, 688 (5th Cir. 2015); Brewer v. Stephens, 605 Fed. Appx. 417 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?