Martin v. TrumpDemacratsRepubilcans

Filing 9

Order Accepting 7 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/12/2017) (rekc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CHERYL SHERRY ANN MARTIN Plaintiff, v. TRUMP, DEM[O]CRATS, AND REPUBLICANS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-992-L ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 2), filed April 7, 2017. On May 16, 2017, Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), recommending that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for want of prosecution. No objections were filed to the report. Having reviewed the record in this case, Report, and applicable law, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order. It is so ordered this 12th day of October, 2017. _________________________________ Sam A. Lindsay United States District Judge Order – Solo Page

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?