Martin v. TrumpDemacratsRepubilcans
Order Accepting 7 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order. (Ordered by Judge Sam A Lindsay on 10/12/2017) (rekc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CHERYL SHERRY ANN MARTIN
TRUMP, DEM[O]CRATS, AND
Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-992-L
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 2), filed April 7, 2017. On May 16, 2017,
Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney entered the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of
the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), recommending that pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b), the court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for want of prosecution. No
objections were filed to the report. Having reviewed the record in this case, Report, and applicable
law, the court determines that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct, and
accepts them as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses without prejudice this action
for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order.
It is so ordered this 12th day of October, 2017.
Sam A. Lindsay
United States District Judge
Order – Solo Page
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?