State of Texas et al v. Blakely
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 6 Findings and Recommendations that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case, necessitating its remand to state court, the Court need not consider the merits of the 9 motion for TRO. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/12/2017) (svc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in
this case. An objection was filed by Defendant Quincy Blakely. The District Court reviewed de novo
those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was
made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain
error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of
the United States Magistrate Judge. After filing his objections, Defendant filed a motion for
temporary restraining order (“TRO”). But, because the Court has accepted Judge Horan’s
recommendation that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case, necessitating its
remand to state court, the Court need not consider the merits of the motion for TRO.
DATE: May 12, 2017
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?