Li v. Dallas Municipal Court
ORDER: On 8/24/2017, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (See docs. 11 , 12 .) Accordingly, the 10 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and recommendation for dismissal are hereby VACATED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez on 8/25/2017) (mcrd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS MUNICIPAL COURT,
Civ. Action No. 3:17-CV-1662-B
Pursuant to Special Order No. 3-251, this pro se case has been automatically referred for
judicial screening. On August 10, 2017, it was recommended that this action be dismissed under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) because the plaintiff had failed to file an amended complaint and either pay
the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within fourteen days as ordered,
despite notice that failure to do so could result in the dismissal of her case. (See doc. 10.) On
August 24, 2017, the plaintiff filed file an amended complaint and an application to proceed in
forma pauperis. (See docs. 11, 12.) Accordingly, the August 10, 2017 findings, conclusions,
and recommendation for dismissal are hereby VACATED.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2017.
IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?