William v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al

Filing 23

Order Accepting 21 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59E With Objection to Magistrate Recommendation is DENIED and the Objections are OVERR ULED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss based on Rule 12(c) (Docs. 10 and 14 ) are GRANTED, and all claims against both defendants are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 2/13/2018) (rekc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IVERY T. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND AND PAROLE and RISSIE OWENS, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL NO. 3:17-CV-1973-K ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. A Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59E With Objection to Magistrate Recommendation was filed by Plaintiff (pro se) on January 29, 2018 (Doc. No. 22). The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 59E With Objection to Magistrate Recommendation, is DENIED and the Objections are OVERRULED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss based on Rule 12(c) (Docs. 10 and 14) are GRANTED, and all claims against both defendants are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed February 13th, 2018. ________________________________ ED KINKEADE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?