Wells Fargo Bank National Association v. Platt et al

Filing 81

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Attorney's Fees (ECF No. 79 ) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is awarded $23 ,800.00 in attorney's fees and $966.26 in costs-$24,766.30 in total. Defendants are ordered to pay such amount to Plaintiff as a further obligation owed by them under the Note and Security Instrument. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/27/2020) (ctf)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-02106-N-BT Document 81 Filed 07/27/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1287 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-FXD2, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-FXD2, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-02106-N (BT) v. GREGORY PLATT and PAULA PLATT, Defendants. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated May 27, 2020 (ECF No. 80). The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (ECF No. 79) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is awarded $23,800.00 in attorney’s fees and $966.26 in costs—$24,766.30 in total. Defendants are ordered to pay such amount to Plaintiff as a further obligation owed by them under the Note and Security Instrument. 1 Case 3:17-cv-02106-N-BT Document 81 Filed 07/27/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1288 SO ORDERED, this 27th day of July, 2020. __________________________________ DAVID C. GODBEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?