Wells Fargo Bank National Association v. Platt et al
Filing
81
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Attorney's Fees (ECF No. 79 ) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is awarded $23 ,800.00 in attorney's fees and $966.26 in costs-$24,766.30 in total. Defendants are ordered to pay such amount to Plaintiff as a further obligation owed by them under the Note and Security Instrument. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 7/27/2020) (ctf)
Case 3:17-cv-02106-N-BT Document 81 Filed 07/27/20
Page 1 of 2 PageID 1287
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN
TRUST 2007-FXD2, ASSET-BACKED
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-FXD2,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:17-cv-02106-N (BT)
v.
GREGORY PLATT and
PAULA PLATT,
Defendants.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford dated
May 27, 2020 (ECF No. 80). The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions,
and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Attorney’s
Fees (ECF No. 79) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is awarded $23,800.00 in
attorney’s fees and $966.26 in costs—$24,766.30 in total. Defendants are ordered
to pay such amount to Plaintiff as a further obligation owed by them under the
Note and Security Instrument.
1
Case 3:17-cv-02106-N-BT Document 81 Filed 07/27/20
Page 2 of 2 PageID 1288
SO ORDERED, this 27th day of July, 2020.
__________________________________
DAVID C. GODBEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?