King v. Shannon

Filing 20

ORDER ACCEPTING 14 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court DENIES Plaintiff Cyndi King's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as her interlocutory appeal [Dkt. No. 10 ] and, for th e reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation, CERTIFIES under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that Kings interlocutory appeal is not taken in good faith. (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 12/5/2017) (sss)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
CYNDI KING,
Plaintiff,
V.
JUDGE SHANNON,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

No. 3:17-cv-2922-K

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a
recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed Documents 15, 16, and 17, which the
Court will liberally construe as Objections.

The District Court reviewed de novo those

portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which
objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and
recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court
therefore DENIES Plaintiff Cyndi King’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
as her interlocutory appeal [Dkt. No. 10] and, for the reasons stated in the findings,
conclusions, and recommendation, CERTIFIES under Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 24(a)(3)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)

that King’s interlocutory appeal is not taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED.
Signed December 5th, 2017.

____________________________________
ED KINKEADE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE