Budri v. FirstFleet Inc

Filing 30

ORDER ACCEPTING 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. All pending 14 , 16 , 17 , 20 Motions to Remand are DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 11/20/2017) (ams)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ADRIANO KRUEL BUDRI, Plaintiff, vs. FIRSTFLEET, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3: 17-CV-2945-C-BN ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed on November 3, 2017, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). The Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation relate to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand, filed November 2, 2017. The Court has further reviewed Plaintiff s jive additional motions to remand that were filed subsequent to the Magistrate's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. The Court views these subsequent motions to remand as objections. Likewise, the Court also considered Plaintiffs two specifically-titled objections filed subsequent to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. After a de novo review of all relevant matters and filings, the Court finds that Plaintiff s objections should be OVERRULED. The Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Therefore, the Plaintiffs Motion to Remand is DENIED. To the extent that the docket in the above-styled and -numbered civil action needs clarification, all pending "Motions to Remand" are denied and should be termed by the Clerk. SO ORDERED. Dated November 20,2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?