Murphy v. Plock

Filing 5

Order Adopting 4 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 3 Complaint filed by Thomas Lamont Murphy. Accordingly, the above styled and numbered civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. All relief not expressly granted by this Order is DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/30/2018) (epm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION

THOMAS LAMONT MURPHY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHIP PLOCK,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-3344-C-BK

ORDER
On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Thomas Lamont Murphy's " Sworn Criminal
Complaint and Sworn Affidavit," filed December 11 , 2017 . The United States Magistrate Judge
entered her Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation on January 3, 2018, recommending that
the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for want of jurisdiction. Murphy failed to file any
objections to the Magistrate Judge ' s recommendation and the time to do so has expired.
The Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error
and finds none. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the abovestyled and -numbered civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of
subject-matter jurisdiction. Al_ re;,tfnot expressly granted by this Order is DENIED .
l
SO ORDERED this

~

day of January, 20

.

.,~