Brooks v Wells Fargo Bank NA

Filing 24

Order Accepting 22 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiff's 4 Motion for Stay for Writ of Possession is DENIED, and the defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/13/2018) (zkc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TIMOTHY BROOKS, Plaintiff, VS. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-3443-G (BH) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court. The plaintiff’s Motion for Stay for Writ of Possession dated, 22nd September 2017 in Cause #CC 15-05401-E at County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas, Appeals Courts Cause #05-16-00616 and in State District Court Case #DC-14-13646, filed December 19, 2017 (docket entry 4) is DENIED, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss and brief in support, filed January 11, 2018 (docket entry 10) is GRANTED. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff’s claims will be DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. July 13, 2018. ___________________________________ A. JOE FISH Senior United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?