Brooks v Wells Fargo Bank NA
Filing
35
ORDER ACCEPTING 33 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Motion for New Trial and Reconsideration of the Court's 7/13/2018 Judgment, (docket entry 26 ), and plaintiff's Motion for Stay with Reconsiderat ion New Trial dated 10th August 2018 in cause # CC 15-05401-E at County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas, Appeal Courts Cause # 05-16-00616 and in State District Court Case # DC-14-13646, (docket entry 27 ) are DENIED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 10/24/2018) (axm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
TIMOTHY BROOKS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:17-CV-3443-G (BH)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings,
conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any
objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District
Judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.
The plaintiff Timothy Brooks’ Motion for New Trial and Reconsideration of the Court’s
July 13, 2018 Judgment, filed August 10, 2018 (docket entry 26), and plaintiff’s Motion
for Stay with Reconsideration New Trial dated 10th August 2018 in cause # CC 15-05401-E
at County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas, Appeal Courts Cause # 05-16-00616
and in State District Court Case # DC-14-13646, filed August 10, 2018 (docket entry 27)
are DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
October 24, 2018.
___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?