Hernandez v. Mapei Corporation
Filing
21
Order Accepting F 19 Findings and Recommendations on Motion re: 14 Motion to Dismiss. It is Ordered that the Plaintiff's claims in this action are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend within thirt y days of the date of this order, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that cures the factual deficiencies raised by the Magistrate Judge. If no motion for leave to amend is filed within that time, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice without further notice. (Ordered by Judge David C Godbey on 8/31/2018) (epm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
LEONOR HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
MAPEI CORPORATION,
Defendants
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:17-CV-3515-N-BK
ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation
in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those
portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was
made. The objections are overruled and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
It is therefore Ordered that the Plaintiff’s claims in this action are dismissed without
prejudice. Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend within thirty days of the date of this
order, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint that cures the factual deficiencies raised
by the Magistrate Judge. If no motion for leave to amend is filed within that time, the Court will
dismiss this action with prejudice without further notice.
SO ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2018.
_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE DAVID C. GODBEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?