United States of America v. Tallis
Filing
13
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations re: 11 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 USA's Petition to Enforce IRS Summons. Respondent Samuel F. Tallis is ORDERED to appear before IRS Revenue Officer David Dodgen or anothe r officer of the IRS, at 1100 Commerce Street, Room 245, Dallas, Texas, 75242, on 5/25/2018, at 10:00 a.m., to testify and produce all documents and records specified in the Summons attached as Exhibit A to the Petition to Enforce, Doc. 1 -1 at 6. All court costs are taxed against Respondent. (Ordered by Judge Jane J. Boyle on 5/11/2018) (epm)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner,
v.
SAMUEL F. TALLIS,
Respondent.
§
§
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-0601-B-BK
§
§
§
§
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF
THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this
case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and
recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts the Findings, Conclusions and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the United States’ (IRS) Petition to Enforce IRS Summons, Doc. 1, is GRANTED
to the extent stated in the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge. Respondent Samuel F. Tallis is ORDERED to appear before IRS Revenue Officer David Dodgen
or another officer of the IRS, at 1100 Commerce Street, Room 245, Dallas, Texas, 75242, on May 25,
2018, at 10:00 a.m., to testify and produce all documents and records specified in the Summons
attached as Exhibit “A” to the Petition to Enforce, Doc. 1-1 at 6. All court costs are taxed against
Respondent.
SO ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2018.
_________________________________
JANE J. BOYLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?