Jackson v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Filing 29

Order Accepting 28 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Since the plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint as allowed by the recommendation, the Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support, filed 9/21/2 018 (doc. 17 ), is GRANTED in part, and her remaining claims are dismissed sua sponte. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff's claims against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage will be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 8/6/2019) (zkc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
NIKISHA M. JACKSON,
Plaintiff,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§

v.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,
Defendant.

Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-937-M-BH

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Since the plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint as allowed by the recommendation,
the Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support, filed September 21, 2018 (doc. 17), is GRANTED in
part, and her remaining claims are dismissed sua sponte. By separate judgment, all of the plaintiff’s
claims against Wells Fargo Home Mortgage will be DISMISSED with prejudice.
SIGNED this 6th day of August, 2019.

_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
CHIEF JUDGE