Dulceak v. Berryhill

Filing 7

ORDER: The Court VACATES its May 23, 2018 5 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, and DENIES as moot 3 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford on 6/27/2018) (ykp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION EILEEN DULCEAK, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § No. 3:18-CV-1302-N (BT) ORDER This Social Security Appeal has been automatically referred to the United States magistrate judge for pretrial management pursuant to Special Order No. 3251. Before the Court is Plaintiff Eileen Dulceak’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [ECF No. 3], filed on May 22, 2018. On May 23, 2018, the Court entered its Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation recommending that the District Court deny Plaintiff’s Application, because the information provided in Plaintiff’s Application showed that Plaintiff’s household has sufficient funds to pay the filing fee. See Recommendation 2 [ECF No. 5]. On June 4, 2018, Plaintiff paid the $400 filing fee. See Payment [ECF No. 6]. Therefore, the Court VACATES its May 23, 2018 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, and DENIES as moot Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. 1 SO ORDERED. June 27, 2018. ____________________________ REBECCA RUTHERFORD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?