Hampton v. Underwood

Filing 12

ORDER ACCEPTING 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Karen Gren Scholer on 10/15/2018) (aaa)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
WILLIAM DOUGLAS HAMPTON,
#26034-44,
Petitioner,
vs.

)
)

)

No. 3:18-CV-1499-S

)
)
)

WARDEN UNDERWOOD,
Respondent.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in
accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), the CoUli is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions
of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the
Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge, the petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
A ce1iificate of appealability (COA) is not required to appeal in a case under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241. See Montano v. Texas, 867 F.3d 540, 547 n.8 (5th Cir. 2017). If the petitioner files a notice
of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in .fonna
pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account.

SIGNED this_!_£ day of

OG-b> L.,.e t

, 2018.

u