Lea v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING #6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUIRING SERVICE: The court orders the clerk of court to issue summons and the United States Marshal to serve process. After docketing of this order, the standing screening referral is terminated. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sidney A Fitzwater on 9/28/2021) (mla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LESLIE FAYE LEA, Plaintiff, V. NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § No. 3:21-CV-2002-D ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUIRING SERVICE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The undersigned district judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The court therefore dismisses any claims against defendants Jason Perry and Anna Smith with prejudice. The court previously granted plaintiff Leslie Faye Lea permission, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, to proceed in forma pauperis in this court until judgment is entered. See Dkt. No. 5. Now, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P.4(c)(3), the court orders the clerk of court to issue summons and the United States Marshal to serve process as follows: Defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation 8800 Freeport Parkway Irving, Texas 75063 After docketing of this order, the standing screening referral is terminated. SO ORDERED. September 28, 2021. ___________________________________ SIDNEY A. FITZWATER SENIOR JUDGE -2   

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?