Carcamo-Robles v. USA

Filing 15

ORDER ACCEPTING 14 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE and Denying Certificate of Appealability. (Ordered by Judge Ada Brown on 5/22/2023) (twd)

Case 3:22-cv-01087-E-BK Document 15 Filed 05/22/23

Page 1 of 2 PageID 75

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
SANTA IGNACIA CARCAMOROBLES, #10711-509,
MOVANT,
V.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
RESPONDENT.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 3:22-CV-01087-E-BK

(CRIMINAL NO. 3:20-CR-00185-E-10)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court has taken under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
of the United States magistrate judge. The petitioner filed no objections. The Court has reviewed
the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for clear error and has found none. IT IS
THEREFORE ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge are accepted. Moreover, considering the record in this case, the Court
DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the
Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its
finding that the Movant has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s
“assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would
find “it debatable whether the [movant] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right”
and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
(Signature Page Follows)

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

Case 3:22-cv-01087-E-BK Document 15 Filed 05/22/23

Page 2 of 2 PageID 76

SO ORDERED
SIGNED this 22nd day of May, 2023.

Ada Brown
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2