Oppenhammer v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Filing
19
ORDER ACCEPTING 14 , 16 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court DENIES Oppermhammers 13 , 15 motions to amend or alter the judgment. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 11/14/2023) (cfk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
LISA OPPENHAMMER,
ID # 2267205,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, Texas Department of
Criminal Justice, Correctional
Institutions Division,
Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-1372-X-BH
Respondent.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Pending before the Court are a pair of Plaintiff Lisa Oppenhammer’s motions
to amend or alter the judgment.
Judge
made
(Docs. 14, 16).
motion.
findings,
(Docs. 13, 15).
conclusions,
and
a
The United States Magistrate
recommendation
in
this
case.
Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez recommends denying each
Oppenhammer
objected
to
Judge
Ramirez’s
recommendations.
Oppenhammer is requesting that the Court “correct a mistake arising from
oversight.” 1
The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed
findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and
reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for
plain error.
1
Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and
Doc. 15 at 1.
1
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Court
DENIES Oppermhammer’s motions to amend or alter the judgment.
(Docs. 13, 15).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November 2023.
____________________________________
BRANTLEY STARR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?