Oppenhammer v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Filing 19

ORDER ACCEPTING 14 , 16 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The Court DENIES Oppermhammers 13 , 15 motions to amend or alter the judgment. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 11/14/2023) (cfk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LISA OPPENHAMMER, ID # 2267205, § § § § § § § § § § Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-1372-X-BH Respondent. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court are a pair of Plaintiff Lisa Oppenhammer’s motions to amend or alter the judgment. Judge made (Docs. 14, 16). motion. findings, (Docs. 13, 15). conclusions, and a The United States Magistrate recommendation in this case. Magistrate Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez recommends denying each Oppenhammer objected to Judge Ramirez’s recommendations. Oppenhammer is requesting that the Court “correct a mistake arising from oversight.” 1 The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. 1 Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Doc. 15 at 1. 1 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Oppermhammer’s motions to amend or alter the judgment. (Docs. 13, 15). IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November 2023. ____________________________________ BRANTLEY STARR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?