Richard v. Macaluso

Filing 16

ORDER ACCEPTING 6 , 14 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 12 Motion to Substitute Party, 13 Motion for Reconsideration. The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (docket entry 4 ) isDENIED as moot. The plaintiff's motions to substitute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a) (docket entries 12 , 13 ) are DENIED. By separate judgment, the plaintiff's case will be DISMISSED. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 1/2/2025)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION

ALONZO RICHARD,
Petitioner,
VS.
PAUL D. MACALUSO,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:23-1619-G-BT

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the
undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions
of the court. The plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (docket entry 4) is
DENIED as moot. The plaintiff’s motions to substitute under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 25(a) (docket entries 12, 13) are DENIED. By separate judgment, the
plaintiff’s case will be DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.
January 2, 2025.
___________________________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge

-2-