Malone v. The State of Texas et al

Filing 7

ORDER ACCEPTING 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (Ordered by Judge Brantley Starr on 11/14/2023) (oyh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DEMETRIA ORLANDO MALONE, TDCJ No. 1347236 Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID Respondent. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-1781-X-BN ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. (Doc. No. 5). Magistrate Judge David L. Horan recommends dismissing Petitioner Demetria Orlando Malone’s writ of habeas corpus because Malone did not exhaust his administrative remedies before filing a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 1 Malone filed an objection. In his objection, Malone argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear this case. 2 The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. 1 Doc. 5 at 2–4. 2 Doc. 6 at 7. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, 1 Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Petitioner Demetria Orlando Malone’s application for a writ of habeas corpus for failure to exhaust state remedies. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2023. ____________________________________ BRANTLEY STARR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?