Gordon v. Astrue

Filing 22

ORDER: re: accepting 17 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that plaintiff is not entitled to a period of disability or disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423, respectively, be, and is hereby, affirmed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 3/30/2011) (egb)

Gordon v. Astrue

Doc. 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION

l.1.S. DlSTR,iCT coun NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS OURT FJl.:ED

r=-- --II
L~

3 0 2011

- ---------- - .. ~.~---.!

CLARA R. GORDON, Plaintiff, VS. MICHAEL J. AS TRUE , COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

§ § § § § § § § § § §

CLERK, LS. DiSTkiCTCOLRl

NO. 4:09-CV-059-A

ORDER On August 9, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings and conclusions and his recommendation in the above-referenced case. The recommendation is that the

decision of defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), that plaintiff, Clara R. Gordon, was "not entitled to a period of disability or disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. affirmed.
§§

416(i) and 423, respectively,

,,1

be

Plaintiff timely filed her objections, and the After a thorough study of the

government filed a response.

record, the magistrate judge's proposed findings and conclusions, and applicable legal authorities, the court has concluded that

lSee Notice of Decision--Unfavorable, Tr. at 25,40, which became the final decision of the Commissioner, id. at 8.

Dockets.Justia.com

plaintiff's objections lack merit and that the recommendation of the magistrate judge should be accepted. Therefore,

The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that plaintiff is not entitled to a period of disability or disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C. is hereby, affirmed. SIGNED March 30, 2011.
§§

416(i) and 423, respectively, be, and

District

2