Williams v. Keffer
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations,, 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Mary L Williams. Court has reviewed pleadings and the record in this case, has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. The Court concludes that, for reasons stated by magistrate judge, the petition for writ of habeas corpus shaould be dismissed w/o prejduice for lack of jurisdiction. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 9/26/2011) (uls)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
MARY L. WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
VS.
JOE KEFFER, Warden,
FMC-Carswell,
Respondent.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-170-Y
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus
under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 of petitioner Mary L. Williams, along with
the August 29, 2011, findings, conclusions, and recommendation of
the United States magistrate judge. The magistrate judge gave the
parties until September 19 to file written objections to the
findings, conclusions, and recommendation.
As of the date of this
order, no written objections have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this
case, and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings,
conclusions and recommendation. The Court concludes that, for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge, the petition for writ of
habeas corpus should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of
jurisdiction.
Therefore, the findings, conclusions and recommendation of
the
magistrate judge are ADOPTED.
Mary Williams’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
SIGNED September 26, 2011.
____________________________
TERRY R. MEANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?