American Airlines Inc v. Travelport Limited et al

Filing 192

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND...granting #179 Motion to Extend Time. Responses due by 1/19/2012 re docs 162, 163, 165, and 169. [see Order for specifics] (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 1/18/2012) (klm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. VS. TRAVELPORT LIMITED, et al. § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-244-Y ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND Before the Court is the parties’ Agreed Motion for Extension of Time (doc. 179). After review, the Court GRANTS the motion. Accordingly, the following extensions are granted to January 19, 2012: (1) The deadline for American Airlines, Inc. (“American”), to respond to the pending motion to dismiss (doc. 169) of Travelport Ltd. and Travelport, L.P. (collectively, “Travelport”). (2) American’s deadline to respond to the pending motion to dismiss (doc. 165) of Orbitz Worldwide, LLC. (3) American’s deadline to respond to the pending motion to dismiss (doc. 163) of Sabre Inc., Sabre Holdings Corporation, and Sabre Travel International Ltd. (collectively, “Sabre”).1 (4) Sabre’s deadline to respond to American’s motion for reconsideration (doc. 162). In addition, the Court notes that several of the parties’ 1 In exchange for Travelport’s agreement to these extensions, American has agreed that (a) Travelport may produce an unredacted version of its counterclaims to the Department of Justice, and (b) American will work in good faith with Travelport to agree to a redacted public version of Travelport’s counterclaims. recently filed documents contain an incorrect style. is the instant motion (doc. 179). One example The parties are advised that, henceforth, any documents containing an incorrect style will be unfiled. SIGNED January 18, 2012. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?