American Airlines Inc v. Travelport Limited et al

Filing 228

Appendix in Support filed by Orbitz Worldwide, LLC, Sabre Holdings Corporation, Sabre Inc, Sabre Travel International Ltd, Travelport Limited, Travelport, LP re #227 Response/Objection to Plaintiff American Airlines, Inc.'s Motion for Rule 16 Status Conference (Falls, Craig)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. TRAVELPORT LIMITED, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:11-cv-00244-Y ) ) ) ) ) ) APPENDIX TO DEFENDANTS’ JOINT RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.’S REQUEST FOR RULE 16 STATUS CONFERENCE Appendix Exhibit (App’x ___) 1 2 3 4 Description Page(s) Email from Carolyn Feeney to Rob Velevis, et al. (Jan. 23, 2012, 2:59 PM) Email from Carolyn Feeney to Rob Velevis, et al. (Jan. 23, 2012, 3:25 PM) Email from Rob Addy to Carolyn Feeney (Jan. 31, 2012, 4:11 PM) Email from Carolyn Feeney to Yolanda Garcia, et al. (Jan. 31, 2012, 5:10 PM) 5-6 7-11 12-13 14-15 Dated: February 13, 2012 /s/ Christopher S. Yates Christopher S. Yates Chris.Yates@lw.com Daniel M. Wall Dan.Wall@lw.com Brendan A. McShane Brendan.McShane@lw.com LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 /s/ Michael L. Weiner Michael L. Weiner michael.weiner@dechert.com DECHERT LLP 1095 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036-6797 212.698.3608 212.698.3599 (Fax) 1 John J. Little Texas State Bar No. 12424230 jlittle@lpf-law.com LITTLE PEDERSEN FANKHAUSER LLP 901 Main Street, Suite 4110 Dallas, TX 75202-3714 Telephone: (214) 573-2300 Facsimile: (214) 573-2323 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, LLC /s/ Sundeep (Rob) Addy Ralph H. Duggins Texas Bar No. 06183700 (rduggins@canteyhanger.com) Scott A. Fredricks Texas Bar No. 24012657 (sfredricks@canteyhanger.com) Philip A. Vickers Texas Bar No. 24051699 (pvickers@canteyhanger.com) CANTEY HANGER LLP Cantey Hanger Plaza 600 West 6th Street, Suite 300 Fort Worth, TX 76102-3685 Phone: (817) 877-2800 Facsimile: (817) 877-2807 Chris Lind Illinois Bar No. 6225464, Colorado Bar No 27719 (chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com) Andrew K. Polovin Illinois Bar No. 6275707 (andrew.polovin@bartlitbeck.com) BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60610 Phone: (312) 494-4400 Facsimile: (312) 494-4440 Mike Cowie mike.cowie@dechert.com Craig Falls craig.falls@dechert.com DECHERT LLP 1775 I Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20006-2401 202.261.3300 202.261.3333 (Fax) Carolyn Feeney carolyn.feeney@dechert.com Justin N. Pentz justin.pentz@dechert.com DECHERT LLP 2929 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19104 215.994.4000 215.994.2222 (Fax) ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS TRAVELPORT LIMITED and TRAVELPORT, LP Of Counsel to Travelport Defendants: Walker C. Friedman State Bar No. 07472500 wcf@fsclaw.com Christian D. Tucker State Bar No. 00795690 tucker@fsclaw.com FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE, P.C. Tindall Square Warehouse No. 1 604 East 4th Street, Suite 200 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 817.334.0400 817.334.0401 (Fax) 2 Donald E. Scott Colorado Bar No. 21219, Illinois Bar No. 2531321 (don.scott@bartlit-beck.com) Karma M. Giulianelli Colorado Bar No. 30919, California Bar No. 184175 (karma.giulianelli@bartlitbeck.com) Sean C. Grimsley Colorado Bar No. 36422, California Bar No. 216741 (sean.grimsley@bartlitbeck.com) Sundeep K. (Rob) Addy Colorado Bar No. 38754 (rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com) BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP 1899 Wynkoop Street, 8thFloor Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone: (303) 592-3100 Facsimile: (303) 592-3140 John T. Schriver JTSchriver@duanemorris.com Paul E. Chronis pechronis@duanemorris.com DUANE MORRIS LLP 190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3700 Chicago, Illinois 60603-3433 312.499.6700 312.499.6701 (Fax) Faith E. Gay faithgay@quinnemanuel.com Steig D. Olson steigolson@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10010 212.849.7000 212.849.7100 (Fax) George S. Cary (gcary@cgsh.com) Steven J. Kaiser (skaiser@cgsh.com) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 974-1920 Facsimile: (202) 974-1999 ATTORNEYS FOR SABRE INC., SABRE HOLDINGS CORPORATION, AND SABRE TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 13th day of February, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the clerk of the court for the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, using the electronic case filing system of the court. The electronic case filing system sent a “Notice of Electronic Filing” to the attorneys of record who have consented in writing to accept this Notice as service of this document by electronic means. /s/ Craig Falls Craig Falls 4 McConnell, Sean From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Feeney, Carolyn Monday, January 23, 2012 2:59 PM Velevis, Rob; Chris.Yates@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com; jlittle@lpf-law.com; wcf@fsclaw.com; Weiner, Michael; Falls, Craig; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlitbeck.com; 'Steven J Kaiser' (skaiser@cgsh.com); sfredricks@canteyhanger.com; Pentz, Justin Garcia, Yolanda; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com RE: AA/Travelport (ND Tex) - call to court regarding February status conference Rob To say we agree the parties “should have” a status conference in February overstates our position. What would be the purpose of such a conference, beyond argument on the pending motions, which the Court will presumably ask for if desired? Thanks, Carrie From: Velevis, Rob [mailto:robert.velevis@weil.com] Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 10:55 AM To: Chris.Yates@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com; jlittle@lpf-law.com; wcf@fsclaw.com; Weiner, Michael; Feeney, Carolyn; Falls, Craig; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; 'Steven J Kaiser' (skaiser@cgsh.com); sfredricks@canteyhanger.com Cc: Garcia, Yolanda; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com Subject: AA/Travelport (ND Tex) - call to court regarding February status conference Counsel, Since the parties are all in agreement that we should have a status conference in February after the briefing on the motions to dismiss is complete, we think it makes sense to have a representative from each of the parties call the court on Monday to ask for a date for a status conference. Please let us know if there is a time on Monday that works so we can try to set it up. Thanks, Rob Robert Velevis Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 200 Crescent Court, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75201-6950 robert.velevis@weil.com +1 214 746 8156 Direct +1 214 746 7777 Fax Joint Defendants App'x Exhibit 1 1 5 ________________________________ The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the original message. Thank you. 2 6 McConnell, Sean From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Feeney, Carolyn Monday, January 23, 2012 3:25 PM Velevis, Rob; Chris.Yates@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com; jlittle@lpf-law.com; wcf@fsclaw.com; Weiner, Michael; Falls, Craig; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlitbeck.com; 'Steven J Kaiser' (skaiser@cgsh.com); sfredricks@canteyhanger.com; Pentz, Justin Garcia, Yolanda; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com RE: AA/Travelport (ND Tex) - call to court regarding February status conference Rob I am aware of the prior communications on this issue. My question remains: what would be the purpose of such a conference, beyond argument on the pending motions, which the Court will presumably ask for if desired? Thanks, Carrie From: Velevis, Rob [mailto:robert.velevis@weil.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 3:18 PM To: Feeney, Carolyn; Chris.Yates@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com; jlittle@lpf-law.com; wcf@fsclaw.com; Weiner, Michael; Falls, Craig; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; 'Steven J Kaiser' (skaiser@cgsh.com); sfredricks@canteyhanger.com; Pentz, Justin Cc: Garcia, Yolanda; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com Subject: RE: AA/Travelport (ND Tex) - call to court regarding February status conference Carrie, I want to call your attention to the email string below. First, Sabre said that it will join our request for a status conference in February after the briefing is complete, then Orbitz said that it too would join in the request. Then Craig Falls, on behalf of Travelport, said that "Travelport agrees with Sabre and Orbitz that it would be more productive to hold a status conference after the briefing is completed on the pending motions to dismiss, AA's motion for reconsideration, and AA's motion for a five-month extension." Thus, we are reaching out simply to effectuate the date in February where we can have the status conference that all parties had agreed to below. --- From: Falls, Craig [mailto:craig.falls@dechert.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 09:50 AM To: 'Chris.Yates@LW.com' <Chris.Yates@LW.com>; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com <rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com>; Rothman, Richard; Feeney, Carolyn <carolyn.feeney@dechert.com>; dan.wall@lw.com; Brendan.McShane@lw.com; Weiner, Michael <Michael.Weiner@dechert.com>; Pentz, Justin <justin.pentz@dechert.com>; andrew.macnally@bartlitbeck.com <andrew.macnally@bartlit-beck.com>; andrew.polovin@bartlit-beck.com <andrew.polovin@bartlit-beck.com>; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com <chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com>; karma.giulianelli@bartlit-beck.com <karma.giulianelli@bartlitbeck.com>; sean.grimsley@bartlit-beck.com <sean.grimsley@bartlit-beck.com>; skaiser@cgsh.com <skaiser@cgsh.com>; gcary@cgsh.com <gcary@cgsh.com>; kreinker@cgsh.com <kreinker@cgsh.com>; lworkdembowski@cgsh.com <lwork-dembowski@cgsh.com> Cc: pyetter@yettercoleman.com; Garcia, Yolanda; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; MMoltenbrey@deweyleboeuf.com <MMoltenbrey@deweyleboeuf.com> Subject: RE: AA requests Richard, Joint Defendants App'x Exhibit 2 1 7 Travelport is also willing to extend the due date for AA’s response to Travelport’s motion to dismiss to January 19 if AA agrees to: (1) permit the DOJ to receive an unredacted version of Travelport’s partial answer and counterclaims [Doc. 172] as requested by Michael Weiner’s letter to MJ Moltenbrey on December 23rd; and (2) create a public version of Travelport’s partial answer and counterclaims [Doc. 172] that redacts the parties’ confidential rd information as requested by Michael Weiner’s email to Rob Velevis on December 23 . Further to the second point, we are attaching a version of Travelport’s partial answer and counterclaims that highlights suggested redactions to protect AA’s confidential information. Please let us know if you agree with the redactions made in the attached. We may make additional redactions to protect Travelport’s confidential information after discussing with our client. With regard to your request for a status conference, Travelport agrees with Sabre and Orbitz that it would be more productive to hold a status conference after the briefing is completed on the pending motions to dismiss, AA’s motion for reconsideration, and AA’s motion for a five-month extension. Regards, Craig From: Chris.Yates@LW.com [mailto:Chris.Yates@LW.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:25 AM To: rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; richard.rothman@weil.com; Feeney, Carolyn; Dan.Wall@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com; Weiner, Michael; Pentz, Justin; Falls, Craig; andrew.macnally@bartlit-beck.com; andrew.polovin@bartlit-beck.com; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; karma.giulianelli@bartlit-beck.com; sean.grimsley@bartlitbeck.com; skaiser@cgsh.com; gcary@cgsh.com; kreinker@cgsh.com; lwork-dembowski@cgsh.com Cc: pyetter@yettercoleman.com; yolanda.garcia@weil.com; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; MMoltenbrey@deweyleboeuf.com Subject: RE: AA requests Richard: Orbitz is willing to extend the time for American Airlines to respond to Orbitz’s motion to dismiss from January 12 to January 19 if American Airlines agrees to extend the time for Orbitz to respond to American Airlines’ motion to compel production of documents (filed during the holiday week) from January 19 to January 26. Please let me know if this is acceptable. We agree with Sabre that a status conference would be most productive once the parties have completed the briefing on all pending motions. Chris From: Rob Addy [mailto:rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:37 AM To: Rothman, Richard; Feeney, Carolyn; Yates, Chris (SF); Wall, Dan (SF); McShane, Brendan (SF); Weiner, Michael; Pentz, Justin; Falls, Craig; Andrew MacNally; Andrew Polovin; Chris Lind; Karma Giulianelli; Sean Grimsley; Steven J. Kaiser (skaiser@cgsh.com); George S. Cary (gcary@cgsh.com); Kenneth Reinker (kreinker@cgsh.com); Larry C. WorkDembowski (lwork-dembowski@cgsh.com) Cc: pyetter@yettercoleman.com; Garcia, Yolanda; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; Moltenbrey, MJ Subject: RE: AA requests Richard, Sabre is willing to extend the due date for AA’s response to our motion to dismiss to January 19 if AA is also willing to extend the due date for our response to your motion for reconsideration to the same date. Please let me know if this compromise is acceptable. 2 8 As for your request for a status conference, we think such a conference would be most productive once the parties have completed their briefing on the pending motions to dismiss, the motion for reconsideration, and American’s motion for continuance. Thus, we are willing to join in your request for a status conference, provided that it is scheduled after the first week in February (when the briefing will be complete). __________________________ Sundeep K. (Rob) Addy Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP 1899 Wynkoop St., Suite 800 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 592-3121 (office) (303) 592-3140 (fax) (512) 507-3973 (cell) This message is the property of Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP. If this message has been delivered to you by mistake, then do not copy or deliver this message to anyone. Instead, destroy it and notify me by reply e-mail. From: Rothman, Richard [mailto:richard.rothman@weil.com] Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 3:57 PM To: Feeney, Carolyn; Chris Lind; Rob Addy; skaiser@cgsh.com; chris.yates@lw.com; dan.wall@lw.com; Brendan.McShane@lw.com; Weiner, Michael; Pentz, Justin; Falls, Craig Cc: pyetter@yettercoleman.com; Garcia, Yolanda; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; Moltenbrey, MJ Subject: RE: AA requests That's fine Carrie. Happy New Year to all. From: Feeney, Carolyn [mailto:carolyn.feeney@dechert.com] Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 4:44 PM To: Rothman, Richard; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; skaiser@cgsh.com; chris.yates@lw.com; dan.wall@lw.com; Brendan.McShane@lw.com; Weiner, Michael; Pentz, Justin; Falls, Craig Cc: pyetter@yettercoleman.com; Garcia, Yolanda; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; Moltenbrey, MJ Subject: RE: AA requests Rich As January 2 is a holiday, we will endeavor to get back to you the following day. Happy new year to you too. Regards, Carrie From: Rothman, Richard [mailto:richard.rothman@weil.com] Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 4:21 PM To: chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; skaiser@cgsh.com; chris.yates@lw.com; dan.wall@lw.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com; Weiner, Michael; Feeney, Carolyn; Pentz, Justin; Falls, Craig Cc: pyetter@yettercoleman.com; Garcia, Yolanda; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; Moltenbrey, MJ Subject: AA requests I hope you've all had a good holiday. I'm writing with two requests: First, we request a short extension to respond to the motions to dismiss filed on December 22. Given the intervening holidays and the fact that American has to respond to three separate briefs, we would ask for a short extension from Thursday January 12th to Monday January 23. I would appreciate if you would let us know by noon on January 2 whether this is 3 9 acceptable. Second, we would like the defendants to join with American in requesting a prompt status conference with the Court so that we can ensure that the issues regarding the sufficiency of American's pleadings are decided in an efficient manner. As you know, American's motion for reconsideration is pending. In addition, we previously asked the Defendants to consent to our including in our second amended complaint factual allegations regarding the identities of travel agents with whom American asserts Defendants conspired, as well as the extent of foreclosure, in order to address certain points in the Court's decision with respect to the First Amended Complaint. We did not receive the consent of all the Defendants, and their motions now attack the Second Amended Complaint for omitting to incude the kind of allegations American was and is prepared to include. We believe it will be inefficient and a waste of the Court's valuable time if the Court has to decide the pending motions before American has an opportunity to include these additional allegations and until the Court passes on the pending motion for reconsideration. In any event, we believe it would make sense to get the Court's view as to how it would like to proceed. Hence, our request for a prompt status conference. Please let us know if you're willing to join in this request. Thanks for your consideration, and Happy New Year to all. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Velevis Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 200 Crescent Court, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75201-6950 robert.velevis@weil.com +1 214 746 8156 Direct +1 214 746 7777 Fax From: Feeney, Carolyn [mailto:carolyn.feeney@dechert.com] Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 1:59 PM To: Velevis, Rob; Chris.Yates@LW.com; Brendan.McShane@lw.com; jlittle@lpf-law.com; wcf@fsclaw.com; Weiner, Michael; Falls, Craig; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; 'Steven J Kaiser' (skaiser@cgsh.com); sfredricks@canteyhanger.com; Pentz, Justin Cc: Garcia, Yolanda; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com Subject: RE: AA/Travelport (ND Tex) - call to court regarding February status conference Rob To say we agree the parties “should have” a status conference in February overstates our position. What would be the purpose of such a conference, beyond argument on the pending motions, which the Court will presumably ask for if desired? Thanks, Carrie 4 10 From: Velevis, Rob [mailto:robert.velevis@weil.com] Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 10:55 AM To: Chris.Yates@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com; jlittle@lpf-law.com; wcf@fsclaw.com; Weiner, Michael; Feeney, Carolyn; Falls, Craig; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; 'Steven J Kaiser' (skaiser@cgsh.com); sfredricks@canteyhanger.com Cc: Garcia, Yolanda; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com Subject: AA/Travelport (ND Tex) - call to court regarding February status conference Counsel, Since the parties are all in agreement that we should have a status conference in February after the briefing on the motions to dismiss is complete, we think it makes sense to have a representative from each of the parties call the court on Monday to ask for a date for a status conference. Please let us know if there is a time on Monday that works so we can try to set it up. Thanks, Rob Robert Velevis Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 200 Crescent Court, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75201-6950 robert.velevis@weil.com +1 214 746 8156 Direct +1 214 746 7777 Fax ________________________________ The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail is from Dechert LLP, a law firm, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy or distribute the e-mail or any attachments. Instead, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you. 5 11 Joint Defendants App'x Exhibit 3 12 13 McConnell, Sean From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Feeney, Carolyn Tuesday, January 31, 2012 5:10 PM Garcia, Yolanda; arotman@yettercoleman.com; Weiner, Michael; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com; skaiser@cgsh.com; Chris.Yates@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com Rothman, Richard; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; pyetter@yettercoleman.com; Falls, Craig; Pentz, Justin; 'wcf@fsclaw.com'; Christian Tucker RE: American Airlines v. Travelport, et al.: Correspondence Yolanda It is clear from Paul Yetter’s letter that AA’s intent in seeking a status conference is to obtain oral argument on pending motions. As you know, Local Rule 7.1(g) states: “Unless otherwise directed by the presiding judge, oral argument on a motion will not be held.” If the Court wishes to hold argument on the pending motions, we will of course attend and participate, and we believe any such argument should cover all pending motions, not just those filed by AA. It is our position, however, that oral argument on the pending motions is not necessary, and therefore we will not join in your request. To the extent you and Mr. Yetter suggest that Travelport previously agreed to join in a request for a status conference, you are mistaken. The January 4 email from Craig Falls simply expressed our agreement with Sabre and Orbitz that any status conference would be premature prior to the completion of briefing on the pending motions. Regards, Carrie From: Garcia, Yolanda [mailto:yolanda.garcia@weil.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:20 PM To: arotman@yettercoleman.com; Weiner, Michael; Feeney, Carolyn; chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com; rob.addy@bartlitbeck.com; skaiser@cgsh.com; Chris.Yates@LW.com; brendan.mcshane@lw.com Cc: Rothman, Richard; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; pyetter@yettercoleman.com Subject: Re: American Airlines v. Travelport, et al.: Correspondence Counsel: We have not heard any response to Paul Yetter's letter regarding the status conference. We believe it is important to ask the Court to set this conference, as it had been our understanding that all parties had agreed to a status conference. Therefore, we are conferring on a motion to set a status conference. Please let me know your position on the motion. I am also available to confer by telephone if you would like to discuss. Yolanda Yolanda Cornejo Garcia Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 200 Crescent Court, Suite 300 Dallas, TX 75201-6950 Joint Defendants App'x Exhibit 4 1 14 yolanda.garcia@weil.com +1 214 746 8134 Direct +1 214 746 7777 Fax From: Rotman, Anna [mailto:arotman@yettercoleman.com] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 08:49 PM To: Weiner, Michael <Michael.Weiner@dechert.com>; Feeney, Carolyn <carolyn.feeney@dechert.com>; Chris J. Lind <chris.lind@bartlit-beck.com>; Rob Addy <rob.addy@bartlit-beck.com>; Steven J Kaiser <skaiser@cgsh.com>; Chris.Yates@LW.com <Chris.Yates@LW.com>; Brendan.McShane@lw.com Cc: Rothman, Richard; Garcia, Yolanda; bbogle@hfblaw.com; rolandjohnson@hfblaw.com; pyetter@yettercoleman.com Subject: American Airlines v. Travelport, et al.: Correspondence Counsel: Please note the attached letter and accompanying exhibit sent on behalf of Paul Yetter. Cordially, Anna Anna Rotman Yetter Coleman LLP 909 Fannin Street, Suite 3600, Houston, Texas 77010 phone 713.632.8064 fax 713.632.8002 http://www.yettercoleman.com This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or organization to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender at the email address above. The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email, postmaster@weil.com, and destroy the original message. Thank you. 2 15

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?