Williams v. Astrue

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 25 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION on Case re: 1 Complaint filed by Edna Williams. The commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 2/27/2012) (klm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION EDNA WILLIAMS § § § § § VS. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-294-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION On January 11, 2012, the United States magistrate judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“the findings”) in this case. In the findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying plaintiff Edna Williams’s claim for disability-insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. On January 17, magistrate’s findings. Plaintiff filed her objections to the The commissioner did not file a response. After review, the Court concludes that the findings should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the commis- sioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 1 SIGNED February 27, 2012. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 The judge’s copy of all mailed to the Honorable Jeffrey Courthouse, 501 West 10th Street, orders should be emailed Cureton_orders@txnd.uscourts.gov. TRM/dc documents related to this motion should be L. Cureton, Eldon B. Mahon United States Room 520, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. Proposed in Word or WordPerfect format to:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?