Well Go USA, Inc. v. UNKNOWN PARTICIPANTS IN FILESHARING SWARM IDENTIFIED BY HASH: B7FEC872874D0CC9B1372ECE5ED07AD7420A3BBB
COMPLAINT against UNKNOWN PARTICIPANTS INFILESHARING SWARM IDENTIFIED BY HASH: B7FEC872874D0CC9B1372ECE5ED07AD7420A3BBB filed by Well Go USA, Inc.. Summons(es) not requested at this time. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $350; Receipt number 0539-4052770) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership (Attachments: # 1 Cover Sheet) (Stone, Evan)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
WELL GO USA, INC.
A TEXAS CORPORATION,
UNKNOWN PARTICIPANTS IN
FILESHARING SWARM IDENTIFIED BY
C.A. NO.: 4:11-cv-00554
PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Well Go USA, Inc., by its attorney, files this Original Complaint and for cause,
respectfully shows the Court as follows:
Plaintiff is an entertainment company, which produces, markets and distributes
motion pictures and other media in the United States and numerous other territories. Plaintiff
brings this action to stop Defendants from copying and distributing unauthorized copies of the
motion picture, “Ip Man 2” over the internet. Plaintiff is the registered copyright owner of the
motion picture in question.
The true names of Defendants are unknown to Plaintiff at this time. What is
known to Plaintiff are the Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses of the internet accounts by which
Defendants conducted their unlawful activities. These IP addresses are assigned to account
holders by their internet service providers, such as Comcast, Verizon and Time Warner Cable.
The IP addresses, along with the date and time the infringement occurred, can be used by the
service providers to identify the persons responsible for the internet accounts in question.
The IP addresses of the internet accounts that were witnessed as being involved in
the infringing activity, together with the date and time of the infringing activity, are included on
Exhibit A of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Take Discovery. The information obtained during
discovery will lead to the identification of the account holders, who may themselves be liable for
the infringement, or who, at a minimum, can give Plaintiff its only opportunity to obtain the
identities of the true infringers thus enabling Plaintiff to amend this Complaint with named
Defendants. Plaintiff further believes that the information obtained in discovery may lead to the
identification of additional infringing parties to be added to this Complaint as Defendants, since
monitoring of this infringement is ongoing.
JURISDICTION, VENUE AND CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because
the suit arises under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, as amended, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et
seq. (the “Copyright Act”).
Venue in this District is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and
28 U.S.C. § 1400(a). On information and belief, to be confirmed during discovery, at least a
portion of Defendants reside or may be found in this District and the remainder of Defendants
reside in this State.
Additionally, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because
Defendants are residents of this State, including this District, and because Defendants’ concerted
acts of copyright infringement occurred in this State, including this District and finally, because
Defendants targeted their tortious conduct at this District, which ultimately harms the market for
Plaintiff’s content in this District. Therefore, Defendants should anticipate being haled into court
in this District.
All conditions precedent have been performed or have occurred.
NATURE OF THE CASE AND JOINDER
Defendants worked in concert, via the internet, in their related and deliberate acts
to reproduce and distribute unlawful, digital copies of Plaintiff’s copyrighted motion picture, “Ip
Man 2” by means of a sophisticated file transfer technology called BitTorrent. This technology
is unique in that it is designed to be used by a group of people working together. The
Defendants in this case represent such a group, which is known as a BitTorrent “swarm.”
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that multiple parties may be joined
as Defendants if the right to relief which Plaintiff is seeking arises “…out of the same
transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences;” and a “…question of law or
fact common to all Defendants will arise in the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 (a)(2).
Defendants each sent and received pieces of a video file embodying Plaintiff’s
motion picture to one another and to other members of the same swarm. These joint acts by the
Defendants of sending and receiving pieces of the file to each other constitute the “same series of
transactions or occurrences,” described in the Federal Rules. The question of law or fact
common to all Defendants is the infringement of Plaintiff’s motion picture, which was
committed by each and every Defendant referenced in this Complaint.
CLAIMS OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiff repeats and realleges each of the allegations contained in
Paragraphs 1 through 10 as if fully set forth herein.
Over a period of at least ten weeks, from May 10, 2011 to July 15, 2011,
Defendants, via the internet, all sought out a reference file called a “.torrent” file, which contains
specific data and a unique key, known as a hash, that are used together to identify and connect to
a given BitTorrent filesharing swarm. The .torrent file and corresponding swarm in this case
were named for Plaintiff’s film, “Ip Man 2” and were created for the express purpose of
obtaining unauthorized copies of this film. Using any of a variety of BitTorrent programs, each
defendant connected to this specific swarm that was “sharing” Plaintiff’s motion picture and
each then began downloading Plaintiff’s film, piece by piece, from other members in the group
simultaneously. Every piece of the film that Defendants successfully downloaded was then made
instantly available to new members joining the group and, if requested by the new members,
those pieces were uploaded to them, typically in a matter of only minutes.
Exhibit A to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Take Discovery lists the IP addresses
of the internet accounts by which Defendants collectively participated to reproduce the
copyrighted work from one another and distribute the copyrighted work to one another and
others without authorization from Plaintiff. In doing so, Defendants have violated Plaintiff’s
exclusive rights of reproduction and distribution.
The foregoing acts of infringement have been willful, intentional, and in disregard
of and with indifference to the rights of Plaintiff.
As a result of each Defendant’s infringement of Plaintiff’s exclusive rights under
copyright, Plaintiff is entitled to relief from Defendants, jointly and severally pursuant, to
17 U.S.C. § 504 and to its reasonable attorney’s fees and full costs pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505.
The conduct of each Defendant is causing and, unless enjoined and restrained by
this Court, will continue to cause Plaintiff great and irreparable injury. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. §§
502 and 503, Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief prohibiting each Defendant from further
infringing Plaintiff’s copyright and ordering that each Defendant destroy all copies of the motion
picture “Ip Man 2,” made in violation of Plaintiff’s exclusive rights to the copyright.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against each Defendant as follows:
For entry of permanent injunctions providing that each Defendant shall be
enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiff’s rights in the copyrighted motion
picture, “Ip Man 2” and any motion picture, whether now in existence or later created, that is
owned, licensed to, or controlled by Plaintiff (“Plaintiff’s Motion Pictures”), including without
limitation by using the internet to reproduce or copy Plaintiff’s Motion Pictures, to distribute
Plaintiff’s Motion Pictures, or to make Plaintiff’s Motion Pictures available for distribution to the
public, except pursuant to a lawful license from Plaintiff. Defendants also shall destroy all
copies of Plaintiff’s Motion Pictures that Defendants have downloaded onto any computer hard
drive or server without Plaintiff’s authorization and shall destroy all copies of those motion
pictures transferred onto any physical medium or device in their possession, custody, or control.
For actual damages or statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504, at the
election of the Plaintiff.
For Plaintiff’s costs.
For Plaintiff’s reasonable attorney’s fees.
For such other and further relief as the Court deems proper.
State Bar No. 24072371
624 W. University Dr., #386
Denton, Texas 76201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?