Davis v. Keffer

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS adopting 7 Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations... Mary Daviss petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See Order for further specifics. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 3/29/2012) (krg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION MARY DAVIS, (BOP No. 13857-078) Petitioner, VS. JOE KEFFER, Warden, FMC-Carswell, Respondent. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO.4:11-CV-648-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Before the Court is the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 of petitioner Mary Davis, along with the March 2, 2012 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge. The magistrate judge gave the parties until March 22 to file written objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation. As of the date of this order, no written objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and the record in this case, and has reviewed for clear error the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. The Court concludes that, for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge, the petition for writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Therefore, the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED. Mary Davis’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. SIGNED March 29, 2012. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?