Lockett v. Astrue
Filing
19
Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 18 Findings and Recommendations on Case re: 1 Complaint,,, filed by Leeland M Lockett. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L Cureton no longer assigned to case. Decision of Commissioner reversed and matter remanded to Comissioner for further admin proceedings. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 9/11/2013) (wrb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
LEELAND MICHAEL LOCKETT
§
§
VS.
§
§
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Action
§
Commissioner of Social Security §
ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-221-Y
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
On August 23, 2013, the United States magistrate judge issued
his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the abovestyled and numbered cause and gave all parties until September 6 to
serve and file with the Court written objections to his proposed
findings, conclusions, and recommendation.
No written objections
have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs.
Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996).
As a result,
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not
required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's
decision for error and has found none.
Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes
that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be
and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is
REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further
administrative proceedings consistent with the magistrate judge's
decision.
SIGNED September 11, 2013.
____________________________
TERRY R. MEANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS -- Page Solo
TRM/chr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?