Ross v. Astrue

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 17 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: After de novo review, this Court concludes that the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings. This Court agr ees that the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence, and that any error committed by the Commissioner was harmless. As a result, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are hereby ADOPTED, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 9/27/2013) (mdf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ANGELA ROSS § § VS. § § CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting § Commissioner of Social Security § ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-283-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and numbered cause: 1. The pleadings and record; 2. The proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States magistrate judge filed on August 19, 2013; and 3. Plaintiff's objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on September 3. After de novo review, this Court concludes that the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's findings. This Court agrees that the Commis- sioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, and that any error committed by the Commissioner was harmless. As a result, the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are hereby ADOPTED, and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. SIGNED September 27, 2013. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS -- Page Solo TRM/chr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?