Miller v. Edward Sloan & Associates

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING 3 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Plaintiff shall have until 12/12/2012, to pay to the clerk of Court the full filing fee of $350.00. (Ordered by Judge Terry R Means on 12/4/2012) (dnw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION FRANCES MILLER § § § § § VS. EDWARD SLOAN & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-790-Y ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS On November 7, 2012, the magistrate judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (“FCR”) (doc. 6). In his FCR, the magistrate judge found that Plaintiff had sufficient monthly resources available to pay the filing fee in this case. Based on this finding, the magistrate judge recommended that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Prepaying Fees or Costs (doc. 3) be denied. Court Without The magistrate judge further recommended that Plaintiff be informed that her complaint will be subject to dismissal without further notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) unless she timely pays the full filing fee of $350.00. Plaintiff was given until November 28, 2012, to file objections to the magistrate judge’s FCR, but she filed none. After review, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s FCR (doc. 6) as the findings and conclusions of this Court for the reasons stated therein. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 3) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall have until December 12, 2012, to pay to the clerk of Court the full filing fee of $350.00. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff’s case, without prejudice but without further notice. SIGNED December 4, 2012. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TRM/dc 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?