Wood v. Bank of America

Filing 55

Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations 49 50 of the United States Magistrate Judge The District Court reviewed the proposedfindings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions , and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted as the findings of the Court. Accordingly, Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment 38 , 44 are GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C O'Connor on 5/18/2015) (ult)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION

ELAINE WOOD,
Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-73-O

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in
this case. See ECF Nos. 49-50. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed
findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the
Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge are accepted as the findings of the Court. Accordingly, Defendants’
Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 38, 44) are GRANTED.
SO ORDERED on this 18th day of May, 2015.

_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE