Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC v. Deane et al

Filing 46

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Ad Litem's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 41 ) is DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must perfect service by publication on the Unknown Heirs of Kimberly S. Deane within 90 days of the issuance of this Order. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/26/2017) (skg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY S. DEANE and PETE M. MARTINEZ, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:15-cv-00682-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate’s recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Ad Litem’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 41) is DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must perfect service by publication on the Unknown Heirs of Kimberly S. Deane within 90 days of the issuance of this Order. SO ORDERED on this 26th day of April, 2017. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?