Ortiz v. Colvin

Filing 27

ORDER: The court accepts the 26 recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on September 14, 2012, plaintiff, Alma Ortiz, is not disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act, be, and is hereby, affirmed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 11/27/2017) (tln)

\~oRil~~tJti~ ~I~~~~~0

IN THE UN<TED 'TATE' ornmcT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXA
FORT WORTH DIVISION
ALMA ORTIZ,

~oURT

[

NOV ;-;;O;-:
..

. . ..
. j
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT r:ouRT

§
§

Plaintiff,

§
§

vs.

§
§

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,'

§
§
§
§
§

Defendant.

NO. 4:16-CV-209-A

ORDER
Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein
Alma Ortiz, is plaintiff and the

Acting Commissioner of Social

Security, currently Nancy A. Berryhill,
defendant.

("Commissioner") is

This is an action for judicial review of a final

decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for
disability and disability insurance benefits. On November 8,
2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed
findings and conclusions and his recommendation ("FC&R"), and
granted the parties until November 22, 2017, in which to file and
serve any written objections thereto.

To date, neither party has

filed objections. Nevertheless, the court has conducted a
thorough study of the record, the magistrate judge's proposed

1

Nancy A. Berryhill replaced Carolyn W. Colvin as acting
commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Therefore,
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Berryhill is
automatically substituted as the party of record.

findings and conclusions, and applicable legal authorities, and
has concluded that the recommendation of the magistrate judge
should be accepted.
Therefore,
The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on
the application for a period of disability and disability
insurance benefits filed on September 14, 2012, plaintiff, Alma
Ortiz, is not disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the
Social Security Act, be, and is hereby,
SIGNED November 27, 2017

District

2

~e