Baker v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
Filing
26
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/27/2017) (baa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
§
MICHAEL BAKER,
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
v.
§
§
U.S. BANK, N.A. IN ITS CAPACITY §
AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
§
REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CSFB §
HOME EQUITY PASS-THROUGH
§
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-F1X1, §
and OCWEN LOAN
§
SERVICING, LLC,
§
§
Defendants.
§
Civil Action No. 4:16-cv-00407-O-BP
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a
recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate’s
recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings,
conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District
Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(ECF No. 17) is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED on this 27th day of March, 2017.
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?