Peebles v. Colvin
Filing
17
Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations. The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case (ECF No. 16). No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judges recommendation is ripe for review. T he District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 1) are correct and they are ADOPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further consideration. Magistrate Judge E. Scott Frost no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/4/2017) (trt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
ROBERT P. PEEBLES,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:16-cv-00730-O
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation
in this case (ECF No. 16). No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation
is ripe for review.
The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and
recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 1) are correct and they are ADOPTED as the
Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby
REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further consideration.
SO ORDERED on this 4th day of August, 2017.
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?