Ives v. Kroger Texas L.P.

Filing 19

ORDER ACCEPTING 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF Nos. 5 and 6 ) is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/7/2017) (skg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION

MINDY IVES,
Plaintiff,
v.
KROGER TEXAS L.P.,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00011-O-BP

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in
this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate’s recommendation is ripe for review. The
District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error.
Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions
of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the
Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (ECF Nos. 5 and 6) is
DENIED.
SO ORDERED on this 7th day of April, 2017.

_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE