Williams v. Berryhill
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 17 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION: It is ORDERED that the report of the magistrate judge should be and hereby is ADOPTED as the decision of this Court. As a result, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 10/26/2017) (bdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
BARBARA SUE WILLIAMS
§
§
V.
§
§
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, COMMISSIONER §
OF SOCIAL SECURITY
§
CIVIL ACTION 4:17-CV-46-Y
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has made an independent review of the following matters
in the above-styled and -numbered cause:
1.
The pleadings and record;
2.
The findings, conclusions, and recommendation of
the United States magistrate judge filed on June 29,
2017 (doc. 17); and
3.
Plaintiff's objections to the findings, conclusions,
and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge
filed on July 13.
Plaintiff makes the same arguments in her objections that were
addressed in detail in the magistrate judge's report.
Essentially,
Plaintiff argues that the Administrative Law Judge’s finding that her
mental impairment is not severe is not supported by substantial
evidence.
But Plaintiff fails to even address the substantial
evidence noted by the magistrate judge.
(FCR (doc. 17) 5–6.)
On the
false premise that there is no substantial evidence, Plaintiff
conclusorily asserts error.
After
de
novo
review,
the
Court
concludes
that
the
Commissioner's decision should be affirmed for the reasons stated in
the magistrate judge's report of his findings, conclusions, and
recommendation.
It is ORDERED that the report of the magistrate judge should
be and hereby is ADOPTED as the decision of this Court.
As a
result, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.
SIGNED October 26, 2017.
____________________________
TERRY R. MEANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
TRM/sbt
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?