Williams v. Berryhill

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 17 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION: It is ORDERED that the report of the magistrate judge should be and hereby is ADOPTED as the decision of this Court. As a result, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 10/26/2017) (bdb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION BARBARA SUE WILLIAMS § § V. § § NANCY A. BERRYHILL, COMMISSIONER § OF SOCIAL SECURITY § CIVIL ACTION 4:17-CV-46-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has made an independent review of the following matters in the above-styled and -numbered cause: 1. The pleadings and record; 2. The findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on June 29, 2017 (doc. 17); and 3. Plaintiff's objections to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States magistrate judge filed on July 13. Plaintiff makes the same arguments in her objections that were addressed in detail in the magistrate judge's report. Essentially, Plaintiff argues that the Administrative Law Judge’s finding that her mental impairment is not severe is not supported by substantial evidence. But Plaintiff fails to even address the substantial evidence noted by the magistrate judge. (FCR (doc. 17) 5–6.) On the false premise that there is no substantial evidence, Plaintiff conclusorily asserts error. After de novo review, the Court concludes that the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's report of his findings, conclusions, and recommendation. It is ORDERED that the report of the magistrate judge should be and hereby is ADOPTED as the decision of this Court. As a result, the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. SIGNED October 26, 2017. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION TRM/sbt -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?