Batti v. Berryhill

Filing 24

ORDER: The court accepts the 23 recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits protectively filed on 7/8/2013, plaintiff, Speransa Batti, is not disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act, be, and is hereby, affirmed. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 9/1/2017) (bdb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT OURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXA
FORT WORTH DIVISION
SPERANSA BATTI,

p-1 (fi/(

§

§

Plaintiff,

§
§

vs.

§

NO. 4:17-CV-059-A

§

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,'
Defendant.

§
§
§

§
§

ORDER
Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein
Speransa Batti, is plaintiff and the

Acting Commissioner of

Social Security, currently Nancy A. Berryhill,
is defendant.

("Commissioner")

This is an action for judicial review of a final

decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for a
period of disability and disability insurance benefits. On August
17, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed
findings and conclusions and his recommendation ("FC&R"), and
granted the parties until August 31, 2017, in which to file and
serve any written objections thereto.

To date, neither party has

filed objections. Nevertheless, the court has conducted a
thorough study of the record, the magistrate judge's proposed
findings and conclusions, and applicable legal authorities, and

'Nancy A. Berryhill replaced Carolyn W. Colvin as acting commissioner of the Social Security
Administration. Therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedme 25( d), Berryhill is automatically
substituted as the party of record.

has concluded that the recommendation of the magistrate judge
should be accepted.
The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on
the application for a period of disability and disability
insurance benefits protectively filed on July 8, 2013, plaintiff,
Speransa Batti, is not disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d)
of the Social Security Act, be,
SIGNED September 1, 2017

Judge

2