Nino v. Berryhill
Filing
22
ORDER: The court accepts the 21 recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on the application for supplemental security income protectively filed on October 7, 2013, plaintiff, Leonel Nino, is not disabled under section 1614 (a) (3) (A) of the Social Security Act, be, and is hereby, affirmed. (Ordered by Judge John McBryde on 2/13/2018) (tln)
LEONEL NINO,
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
vs.
§
§
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION,
§
§
§
§
§
Defendant.
NO. 4:17-CV-100-A
ORDER
Came on for consideration the above-captioned action where
Leonel Nino is plaintiff and the Acting Commissioner of Social
Security, currently Nancy A. Berryhill ("Commissioner")
defendant.
is
This is an action for judicial review of a final
decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claims for a
period of disability and disability insurance benefits ("DIB")
under Title II of the Social Security Act
("SSA").
On January
29, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed
findings and conclusions and his recommendation ("FC&R"), and
granted the parties until February 12, 2018, to file and serve
any written objections thereto.
objections.
To date, neither party has filed
Nevertheless, the court has conducted a thorough
study of the record, the magistrate judge's proposed findings and
conclusions, and applicable legal authorities, and has concluded
that the recommendation of the magistrate judge should be
accepted.
Therefore,
The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that, based on
the application for supplemental security income protectively
filed on October 7, 2013, plaintiff, Leonel Nino, is not disabled
under section 1614 (a) (3) (A) of the Social Security Act, be, and
is hereby, affirmed.
SIGNED February 13, 2018.
District
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?