Govender v. BSI Financial Services et al

Filing 17

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 16 ) are correct and they are ACCEPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 7 ) is GRANTED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/12/2017) (skg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ANA GOVENDER, Plaintiff, v. BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES and WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB, D/B/A CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR BROUGHAM FUND TRUST I, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00288-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case (ECF No. 16). No objections were filed, and the Magistrate’s recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 16) are correct and they are ACCEPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED. SO ORDERED on this 12th day of July, 2017. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?