Bell v. Bank of America et al
Filing
7
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the magistrate judge 5 is hereby ADOPTED as the decision of this Court. As a result, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2 ) is DENIED. If Plaintiff desires to pursue her claims in this cause, she shall pay the full filing and administrative fees to the clerk of this Court no later than 8/14/17, or her claims will be dismissed without prejudice to their refiling. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 7/26/2017) (bdb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
JOHANNA BELL
VS.
BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL.
§
§
§
§
§
ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-509-Y
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE
On June 26, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his
findings, conclusions, and recommendation in this case, recommending
that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. The
magistrate judge gave Plaintiff until July 11 to serve and file
written objections to his decision.
As of the date of this order,
no objections have been filed.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the magistrate
judge is hereby ADOPTED as the decision of this Court. As a result,
Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2)
is DENIED. If Plaintiff desires to pursue her claims in this cause,
she shall pay the full filing and administrative fees to the clerk
of this Court no later than August 14, 2017, or her claims will be
dismissed without prejudice to their refiling.
SIGNED July 26, 2017.
____________________________
TERRY R. MEANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND . . . - Page Solo
TRM/chr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?