Bell v. Bank of America et al

Filing 7

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the magistrate judge 5 is hereby ADOPTED as the decision of this Court. As a result, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2 ) is DENIED. If Plaintiff desires to pursue her claims in this cause, she shall pay the full filing and administrative fees to the clerk of this Court no later than 8/14/17, or her claims will be dismissed without prejudice to their refiling. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 7/26/2017) (bdb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION JOHANNA BELL VS. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL. § § § § § ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-509-Y ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE On June 26, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation in this case, recommending that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. The magistrate judge gave Plaintiff until July 11 to serve and file written objections to his decision. As of the date of this order, no objections have been filed. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the magistrate judge is hereby ADOPTED as the decision of this Court. As a result, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED. If Plaintiff desires to pursue her claims in this cause, she shall pay the full filing and administrative fees to the clerk of this Court no later than August 14, 2017, or her claims will be dismissed without prejudice to their refiling. SIGNED July 26, 2017. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND . . . - Page Solo TRM/chr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?