Johnson v. Union Pacific Railroad
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff's August 1, 2017 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 8/16/2017) (skg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-00630-O
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in
this case (ECF No. 7). No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation is
ripe for review.
The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and
recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 7) are correct and they are adopted as the Findings
and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s August 1, 2017 Motion to proceed in
forma pauperis is DENIED.
SO ORDERED on this 16th day of August, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?