Craven v. Berryhill
Filing
19
Order Adopting 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, NOTICE, AND ORDER. After consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 9/27/2018) (mpw)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
LORI ANN CRAVEN
§
§
VS.
§
§
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
§
Commissioner of Social Security §
ACTION NO. 4:18-CV-008-Y
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
On September 11, 2018, the United States magistrate judge issued
his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the abovestyled and -numbered cause.
The magistrate judge gave all parties
until September 25, 2018, to serve and file with the Court written
objections to his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation.
No written objections have been received from either party.
See
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th
Cir. 1996).
As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),
de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed
the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for
plain error and has found none.
Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes
that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be
and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the commissioner's decision is
AFFIRMED.
SIGNED September 27, 2018.
____________________________
TERRY R. MEANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS--Page Solo
TRM/lnb
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?