Craven v. Berryhill

Filing 19

Order Adopting 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, NOTICE, AND ORDER. After consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 9/27/2018) (mpw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION LORI ANN CRAVEN § § VS. § § NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting § Commissioner of Social Security § ACTION NO. 4:18-CV-008-Y ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS On September 11, 2018, the United States magistrate judge issued his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation in the abovestyled and -numbered cause. The magistrate judge gave all parties until September 25, 2018, to serve and file with the Court written objections to his proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation. No written objections have been received from either party. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996). As a result, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), de novo review is not required. Nevertheless, the Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error and has found none. Thus, after consideration of this matter, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge should be and are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. SIGNED September 27, 2018. ____________________________ TERRY R. MEANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS--Page Solo TRM/lnb

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?