GNL Ridglea, LLC v. Guang Dong Hailea Group Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
27
ORDER ACCEPTING 26 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Hailea's 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 7 ), DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE GNL's Amended Petition (ECF No. 1 -6), and DENIES AS MOOT Central Garden's Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 12 ); Central Garden's Motion for Leave to File Response in Opposition to Hailea's 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack o f Personal Jurisdiction or in the Alternative Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery on Jurisdictional Issues (ECF No. 14 ); Hailea's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 18 ); and the parties' Joint Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the Court's ruling on Hailea's 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 25 ). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/22/2018) (skg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
GNL RIDGLEA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
GUANG DONG HAILEA GROUP
CO., LTD., et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00286-O-BP
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a
recommendation in this case (ECF No. 26). No objections were filed, and the Magistrate
Judge’s recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed
findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned
District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Hailea’s 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of
Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 7), DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE GNL’s
Amended Petition (ECF No. 1-6), and DENIES AS MOOT Central Garden’s Motion to
Intervene (ECF No. 12); Central Garden’s Motion for Leave to File Response in
Opposition to Hailea’s 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or in
the Alternative Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery on Jurisdictional Issues (ECF No.
14); Hailea’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 18); and the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay
Discovery Pending the Court’s ruling on Hailea’s 12(b)(2) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of
Personal Jurisdiction (ECF No. 25).
SO ORDERED on this 22nd day of October, 2018.
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?