Scott v. The City of Fort Worth et al

Filing 10

ORDER ACCEPTING 9 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 9/16/2022) (tjc)

Download PDF
Case 4:22-cv-00675-O Document 10 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION CHARLES EDWARD SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FORT WORTH, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00675-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the case without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). SO ORDERED on this 16th day of September, 2022. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?