Arnold v. Navy Federal Credit Union Foundation et al

Filing 11

ORDER: Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation ("FCR") of the United States Magistrate Judge in this case, ECF No. #10 , recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs action under Federal Rule 41(b). Because Plaintiff did not object to the FCR, the Court reviews it for clear error. Finding that there is no such error in the FCR, the Court AFFIRMS its conclusion and ADOPTS its reasoning. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/9/2024) (sre)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
DEUNTAVIOUS-DECOREY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
ARNOLD,
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
Plaintiff,
REGINALEA KEMP,
v.

No. 4:24-cv-0320-P

Plaintiff,
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
FOUNDATION, ET AL.,
v.
Defendant.
REGIONS BANK ET AL.,

No. 4:23-cv-00841-P

ORDER

Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and RecommDefendants.
ORDER
endation (“FCR”) of the United
States Magistrate Judge in this case,

ECF
No. the
10, recommending
thatUnopposed
the Court Motion
dismiss for
Plaintiff’s
Before
Court is Plaintiff’s
Leave toaction
File
under Federal
Rule
41(b). Because
Plaintiff
did considered
not object to
FCR,
Second
Amended
Complaint.
ECF No.
18. Having
thethe
Motion
the applicable
Court reviews
it for
clear error.
and
docket
entries,
the Court GRANTS the Motion.
Finding
that there
no18th
such day
errorofinSeptember
the FCR, the2023.
Court AFFIRMS
SO
ORDERED
on is
this
its conclusion and ADOPTS its reasoning. Accordingly, this case is
DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED on this 9th day of May 2024.

______________________________________________
Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE