Taylor v. Tarrant County Judicial Courts et al

Filing 19

ORDER ACCEPTING 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge b elieves that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/7/2025) (jnp)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
REGINALD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
v.
TARRANT COUNTY
JUDICIAL COURTS, et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 4:24-cv-586-O-BP

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation
in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for
review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and
Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. To the
extent Plaintiff’s claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), Plaintiff is
permitted to reassert those claims when the conditions under Heck are met.
SO ORDERED on this 7th day of January, 2025.
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE