Brown v. The City of Hurst Texas et al

Filing 26

Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations the Court: (1) GRANTS the City's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19 ) and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Brown's arising under federal law against the City and the Hurst Police Department; (2) DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Temporarily Stop Enforcement of the Hurst City Ordinance 2570 (ECF No. 9 ); and (3) DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's remaining state law claims. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/6/2025) (wxc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
STEVEN D. BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF HURST, TEXAS, et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 4:24-cv-688-O-BP

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation
in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for
review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and
Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, the Court: (1) GRANTS the City’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) and
DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Brown’s arising under federal law against the City and the
Hurst Police Department; (2) DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Temporarily Stop Enforcement of the
Hurst City Ordinance 2570 (ECF No. 9); and (3) DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiff’s remaining state law claims.
SO ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2025.

_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1