Perez v. Lamb County Sheriff's Office et al.

Filing 15

ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 13) are ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 5) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn on 9/8/2021) (lkw)

Case 5:21-cv-00029-M-BQ Document 15 Filed 09/08/21

Page 1 of 2 PageID 56

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUBBOCK DIVISION
ADRIANNA PEREZ,
Institutional ID No. 2818,

§
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
v.
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-029-M-BQ
§
LAMB COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al. §
§
Defendants.
§
ORDER
On February 4, 2021, pro se Plaintiff filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this Court,
proceeding in forma pauperis. On August 17, 2021, the United States Magistrate Judge entered
Findings and Conclusions on Plaintiff’s operative Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 5, 13). The
Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint without
prejudice for want of prosecution in accordance with Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has now expired.
After making a plain error review of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge, the Court concludes that the Findings and Conclusions are correct. It is
therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (ECF No. 13) are ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 5) is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution.

Case 5:21-cv-00029-M-BQ Document 15 Filed 09/08/21

SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 8, 2021.

2

Page 2 of 2 PageID 57